Brian Cronin says that comic book characters tend to
revert to the mean. By this, he means:
This is one of the more obvious theories, but my pal Dan Larkin said I should write it up, so here it is! In serialized comics, given enough time, comics will eventually regress to the mean. The “mean” in this instance is defined as what the average comic book writer has identified as the classic take on that particular character.
This doesn’t mean that characters don’t grow as characters, just that their circumstances/status quos tend to eventually regress to the mean.
You can have Julia Carpenter have an extended run as Spider Woman. You can even have a brand new character like Mattie Franklin get her own book as Spider Woman. Eventually, though, Spider Woman will be Jessica Drew once again, as Jessica Drew as Spider Woman is the “mean.
While I agree that character mythologies tend to stay the same with comic book characters (which is a pretty obvious argument indeed), I don't think that characters necessarily revert to the mean. Primarily because I think there isn't a mean. A few things:
1) Cronin has to be careful with his definition of "mean." He says that it's what the "average comic book writer has identified as the classic take on that particular character." I think the problem here is the phrase "classic take." Bill Finger's take on Batman is a classic take, yet Frank Miller's 1986 take on Batman is also now considered both classic and seminal. Yet, they are very different takes. An "average" writer today can subscribe to either one, neither of which is an incorrect take.
2) I think the fact that there are such different takes on a character makes his argument a big weaker. The fact that many people identify with a darker, grittier Batman while simultaneously acknowledging a lighter, less insane one is evidence that characters change and can be interpreted in different ways. The key is that the core mythology has to remain intact. Cronin even acknowledges that characters change. He even acknowledges that they change dramatically (Dick Grayson becomes Nightwing). So, I'm left a little uncertain as to what he's looking for. Either the character changes (which we just proved happens) or the core mythology of the character changes, which would essentially imply that it would not be the same character. You can't do this as a writer. This is why I too suspect that Captain America will be back and that Bruce Wayne will eventually return as Batman following Morrison's RIP arc. But this doesn't have to do with "reverting" to the mean--it has to do with telling the story of the same character.
Any thoughts?